An Inspector's investigation was initiated in the early hours of this morning, and a report will be issued in due course. I am sure that the House will wish to join with me in expresisng sympathy with the relatives and friends of those who died and also with the survivor. I join with my hon. Friend in expressing very deep sympathy with the relatives of those concerned in this second disaster in the Greater Manchester area involving a British Midland aircraft.
I also share the nation's relief at the merciful survival of Miss Timson. Is my hon. Friend satisfied that the disaster in no way reflects on the very high standards of safety and other arrangements at Manchester Airport?
Is he also satisfied that what has happened—in particular, the use of this type of aircraft—does not imply any future danger for the many thousands of people living in the immediate vicinity of Manchester Airport?
Finally, when does he expect the inquiry's report, and will he be asking British Midland to discontinue using or to ground some of their arcraft pending the outcome of the inquiry? On present evidence, there is no reason to suppose that the arrangements at Manchester Airport are in any way defective. On the contrary, for the reasons that I mention, the fire services were alerted and took very prompt action. As for the aircraft itself, although there have been a number of accidents to Viscounts, we should not fail to recognise that there are a very large number flying.
But, obviously, if the inquiry shows that there are special factors in this case, action will be taken. Reports take some time to prepare because of the need for extensive inquiries into the causes of accidents.
But, as I think my hon. Friend knows, in the event of any information coming to light at an earlier stage, action will be taken at once, whatever it may be. I think that it is much too soon to place the responsibility for the accident either on the aircraft or on anyone else.
Here again, if the evidence shows that it is necessary to ground any aircraft, this will be done. I know that my right hon. Friends would wish to be associated with the expressions of sympathy to the friends and relatives of those concerned, and of course, we appreciate that it is much too early to ask the hon.
Gentleman to give us any real indication as to the basic causes of this accident. Will he bear in mind the importance of making an announcement as soon as possible if it becomes clear that the aeroplane was not in itself at fault, in view of the inevitable anxiety as a result of what I think is the fourth Viscount crash within a relatively short time? I think that the hon. The owner of the motor vehicle, whether or not he was present at the time of the accident, shall on demand by any Police Officer or Grama Seva Niladhari, furnish all information in his possession as to the name, address, description, antecedents and whereabouts of the driver of the vehicle and of every person in the vehicle at the time of the accident.
Every such owner who, in compliance with any such demand, gives any information pertaining to his knowledge is false or in any particular misleading, shall be guilty of an offence under this Act. Every, person, other than the driver, who was in the vehicle at the time of the accident shall ;. Where in any accident due to the use of a motor vehicle on a highway any injury is caused to any person, and the driver of the motor vehicle on being requested so to do by a Police Officer or a Grama Seva Niladhari, or by the person who has been injured or any other person acting on his behalf, does not at the time produce the certificate of insurance or of security relating to that vehicle.
Provided, however, that no person shall be deemed to have contravened the provisions of this subsection by reason only of his failure to produce such certificate, if, before the expiry of a period of five days from the date on which the production of the certificate was so required, he produces the certificate in person at such Police Station as may have been specified by him on that date;.
To make observations and to take down the sketch of the accident and to clear for traffic or to divert traffic. If the inquiries or damages caused are of minor nature and damages are of trivial nature and if parties are willing to come to a settlement it should be allowed. However, the Police have the right to file a plaint for rash and negligent driving.
Police will take action to release such vehicles involved in minor accidents without delay having tested mechanical condition of the vehicles, and all other accidents where damages caused are heavy Police will get the RMV to examine the vehicles and release vehicles. In all accidents, Police will take action when there is sufficient evidence to prosecute offenders other than trivial accidents.
In certain trivial accidents if parties are willing to come to a settlement where slight negligence on the part of the offending driver is surfaced, action would not be taken to prosecute. However power of prosecution in Courts is vested with the Police.
Do you actually spam the ability like what merryhonmas said? Or do you still encounter it even if there is a slight delay? If you can only replicate it while spamming the ability, then it may be resolved if I add a 0.
I can't really fix something I can't personally replicate - it has never happened to me before. Warchief is a hero of spamming specially because of that ult so yes you can give that delay thing a try, it might work.
Also i uploaded 4 console. Cl: [] Clearing all state data Cl: [] Shutting down client You can post about it again after Patch 4. I don't know if it actually will or not. Warchief Bad Packet Crash. Recommended Posts. Dampeer9 0 Posted June 14, Posted June 14, Link to post Share on other sites. ElementUser Posted June 14, Posted June 14, edited.
Please ensure you have no mods - I'll move this to Indeterminate.
0コメント